# SYRIA COMMITTEES/ SYRIA: ‘WHITE HELMETS’ (NATO AND SORÖS FUNDED) STAGED ‘RUSSIAN BOMBING’ SCENE NEAR ALEPPO, LAPPED-UP BY MAINSTREAM MEDIA !
Syria: White Helmets (western-backed pseudo NGO the ‘White Helmets’ are NATO and Georges Sorös funded) Staged ‘Russian Bombing’ Scene Near Aleppo, Lapped-up By Mainstream Media, said a ‘21st Century Wire’ stuning report!
* Image of one of the burned out SARC trucks in Urm-Al-Kubra, West Aleppo (Image Source: Reuters).
* One of the burned out SARC humanitarian aid trucks, despite claims of an air-strike, the surrounding countryside, road and electrical pylons are undamaged (Image Soure: Reuters)
US-LED ONE HOUR-LONG AIRSTRIKE
WHICH MASSACRED MORE THAN 60 SYRIAN ARMY SOLDIERS …
Saturday 17 September saw one of the most shocking and incendiary international incidents of this NATO war against Syria – a US-led, one hour-long airstrike which massacred more than 60 Syrian Army soldiers and wounded at least 100 others near the city of Deir al-Zour. The US claimed they were targeting ISIS. However, the US brutal attack on the Syrian Army provided cover for an ISIS advance into Syrian Army held territory.
… JUST 48 HOURS LATER, NEW REPORTS THEN BEGAN TO CIRCULATE THROUGH THE WESTERN MEDIA ABOUT AN ATTACK ON A UN-SPONSORED AID CONVOY
Just 48 hours later, new reports then began to circulate through the western media about an attack on a UN-sponsored Aid Convoy. It is alleged that 18 of the 31 reported trucks were bringing “food relief ” from UN stores, said to be managed by Syrian Arab Red Crescent (SARC),to the town of Urm al-Kubra, west of Aleppo. This is an area controlled by one terrorist group, US backed Nour al-din al-Zenki and surrounded by US/NATO supported Al Nusra Front (al Qaeda in Syria)…
The UN and international groups were immediately up in arms: “Yesterday’s attack is a flagrant violation of international humanitarian law and it is unacceptable,” Peter Maurer, president of the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) said in a statement. The only problem is: the NATO backed terrorists occupying areas (such as this area in East Aleppo have never recognized international humanitarian law. That lawlessness applies universally across the spectrum of terrorist entities, including Nusra Front, ISIS and the myriad of US/NATO funded and armed terrorist brigades without exception.
Naturally, the US immediately labeled the attack, “a bombing” and proceeded to accuse both Russia and Syria’s Airforce. The US claimed it had reached a “preliminary conclusion” that indicates two Russian Su-24 jets were responsible, although unnamed ‘intelligence sources‘ have told media operative Barbara Star from CNN and other media outlets, that their intelligence “is classified and so they can’t actually show it to anyone” …
WOULD COUNTRIES LIKE THE US AND UK LIE AND FABRICATE INTELLIGENCE OR EVIDENCE , IN ORDER TO ACCELERATE A CASE FOR ESCALATING MILITARY INTERVENTION?
Q: would countries like the US and UK lie and fabricate intelligence or evidence , in order to accelerate a case for escalating military intervention? The answer is a resounding ‘yes’. They’ve done it before, and they most certainly will go with what works in terms of advancing their geopolitical agenda. In the words of Donald Rumsfeld, this is one of those “known knowns.”
Unfortunately, the evidence doesn’t support US claims that a combined Russian/Syrian airstrike hit this Aid Convoy. The evidence points more towards a ground attack, one most likely carried out by Nusra Front terrorists, with the aftermath filmed and media-managed as a false flag attack by the western-backed pseudo NGO the ‘White Helmets.’ Here’s why…
The UN, itself, almost immediately began back-tracking on the initial US-backed conspiracy theory of a ‘Russian airstrike.’ Regardless of this obviously questionable and uninvestigated conjecture, John Kerry and the west doubled-down on their initial, knee-jerk accusation fingering Russia and Syria.
A website called BELLINGCAT, run by Eliot Higgins, immediate produced ‘a report’ entitled, “Confirmed : Russian Bomb Remains Recovered from Syrian Red Crescent Aid Convoy Attack”. This was meant to implicate Russia in the said airstrike, or “bombing” incident. ‘Bellingcat’ claims to be an independent ‘open source‘ intelligence website run “by and for citizen investigative journalists“, but in reality, it exists in order to support the narratives that serve NATO, and more specifically – the British Foreign Office or the US State Dept narratives. Producing flimsy and unsubstantiated evidence to support accusations against Russia, especially with regards to the Ukraine and the MH17 event, and now with Syria – seems to be Belingcat’s primary function. One clear indicator that Bellingcat is probably working on behalf of the British Foreign Office is that Eliot Higgins has a direct line of communication with the Foreign Office construct, embedded exclusively in and alongside Nusra Front & ISIS terrorist forces in Syria, none other than the ‘White Helmets’. This connection was openly admitted by Bellingcat: “Since the post was published the Bellingcat team has been in touch with the Syrian Civil Defence unit closest to the attacked site, who recovered and photographed two pieces of debris, including the object featured above.”
THE REAL SYRIA CIVIL DEFENCE EXPOSE
NATO’S ‘WHITE HELMETS’ AS TERRORIST-LINKED IMPOSTERS
It’s worth noting here that the ‘White Helmets’ plagiarized the “Syria Civil Defence” name, after stealing ambulances and fire engines, kidnapping and even murdering real rescue volunteer workers, according to members of the REAL Syria Civil Defense shortly after this western creation was launched in 2013 by high ranking British and NATO military intelligence operative James Le Mesurier: “They came in and they drove us out of our homes and they came to the Syria Civil Defence yard and they killed some of my comrades, they kidnapped others. They wanted to force me to work with them. I escaped at night. I was forced to leave my teenage sons behind. They burned my house to the ground and they put my name on all the terrorist checkpoints so if I go back, they will kill me.” ~ ‘Khaled’ (REAL Syria Civil Defense survivor, recounting 2012 terrorist takeover, Aleppo).
Note also that the ‘White Helmets’ are drawing finance of at least $60 million primarily from NATO members states, including at $23 million from US AID (US State Dept), $25 million (£19.7 million) from British Foreign Office, $4.5 million (€4 million) Netherlands, and other funding directly from the EU supposedly for ‘assistance and training,’. Initial investigations into the extent of the EU funding and equipping of this deceitfully self-proclaimed “independent first-responder” is still ongoing but has already demonstrated that the EU is also heavily invested in this fifth column, terrorist support ‘NGO. ’It was announced, just today, that the German Foreign Office is officially funding the White Helmets with $7.86 million (7 million Euros).
Also, the recent awarding of the “Alternative Nobel Peace Prize” to the White Helmets seems to be another conveniently-timed PR device designed to further legitimize additional public funding for what can rightly be described as a terrorist-linked criminal entity. This funding is concealed behind the generic heading of “Emergency Health and Relief Support to the Population Affected by the Crisis in Syria”, through the Directorate-General for European Civil Protection and Humanitarian Aid Operations (DG-ECHO), formerly known as the European Community Humanitarian Aid Office.
“PROOF” OF A RUSSIAN BOMB LANDING??? Continue reading
# LUCMICHEL.NET/ COMME JE L’ANALYSAIS EN JANVIER 2014 DANS MON EMISSION ‘DJIHADISTES BELGES’ SUR AFRIQUE MEDIA, LES FILLES DJIHADISTES SONT LE NOUVEAU DANGER …
Voir Paris, Bruxelles, Verviers …
SYRIA COMMITTEES/ MINISTER LAVROV (MAE RUSSE): ‘WE ASKED THE AMERICANS TO START AN HONEST INVESTIGATION INTO THE CONVOY ATTACK’ …
SYRIA COMMITTEES/ CONSEILLERE DU PRESIDENT ASSAD: ‘LE PENTAGONE ET LES MILITANTS DE DAESH COORDONNENT LEURS ACTION’ !
Bouteina Shabaan, conseillère politique et médiatique du Président syrien Assad , estime que « ce que les USA ont fait à Deir-ez-Zor est infâme » et voit « un lien évident entre les manœuvres des Usa et les actons terroristes des djihadistes » en Syrie …
Dessin de Alex : “Star Wars 7 expliqué”
(parodiant la célébre scène “Luke je suis ton père”)
SYRIA COMMITTEES/ ‘THE BOTTOM LINE FOR THE OBAMA ADMINISTRATION IS REGIME CHANGE, WHICH MEANS A JIHADIST VICTORY IN SYRIA. I DON’T KNOW WHY THE RUSSIAN SIDE KEEPS TALKING TO THEM’ (US HISTORIAN)
« Mr. Lavrov must know when he talks to Mr. Kerry that as much as they may seem to agree on various details, in terms of where the two countries want to go in Syria they are poles apart. The bottom line for the Obama administration is regime change, which means a jihadist victory in Syria, and that is the rabbit they are constantly trying to pull out of the hat. I don’t know why the Russian side keeps talking to them as though they have common goals and interests, when in fact they don’t. They are dealing with ideologues here who are dancing to the tune called by the Saudis and other supporters of radical Islamic forces, and they’ve got to stop entertaining that they can somehow make a deal on this… There are no real moderates. They are all Wahhabists, they’re all terrorists, they’re all jihadists. »
- Adel Darwish (American historian, author)
SYRIA COMMITTEES/ ‘WE SHOULD TRY NOT TO MAKE THE SAME MISTAKES THAT WE MADE IN AFGHANISTAN BY TRYING TO DEFEAT RUSSIA IN SYRIA THE WAY THEY DID IN AFGHANISTAN’ (US HISTORIAN)
« I think that John Kerry is torn really between an earlier desire as a diplomat to leave his mark on history as we are coming to the end of this administration. He managed to get a ceasefire with the help of Lavrov and with the help of the Russians. He is also torn between the whole Western propaganda strategy of demonizing Russia. The problem here is that to a certain extent neither of the superpowers can have 100 percent control of what is happening on the ground. The Russians are in the position because it is the regime they can at least control large part of it, while the Americans have armed groups… they cannot really have control over them. And then prior to that they had a strategy of trying to do Afghanistan. We should try not to make the same mistakes that we made in Afghanistan by trying to defeat Russia in Syria the way they did in Afghanistan. That would be a disaster for everybody. I think they should move away from that and really try to cooperate. »
- Adel Darwish (American historian, author)
SYRIA COMMITTEES/ ‘US PRIORITY IN SYRIA: STOP ALEPPO FROM FALLING TO PRO-ASSAD FORCES’ (JOHN KERRY, US SECRETARY OF STATE)
“Strategically, if the jihad terrorists lose eastern Aleppo strategically this war is over”,
- Jim Jatras (former US diplomat, told RT).
“Let’s be clear: Right now, the Obama administration has one priority and that is to stop eastern Aleppo from falling to Syrian government forces. Strategically, if the jihad terrorists lose eastern Aleppo strategically this war is over. The fighting may go on for a while, but that will be the tipping point in terms of who is going to win. They can dance around any way they want, but the bottom line is always going to be to try and stop the Syrian and Russian forces from decimating these jihadists and changing the outcome”, sais Jim Jatras. “The fighting may go on for a while, but that will be the tipping point in terms of who is going to win”, he added.
The international bitterness over the crisis is Syria has been laid bare at a special UN Security Council meeting underway in New York. Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov said he wants a thorough and impartial investigation into the deadly attack on the UN aid convoy near Aleppo, which the US has blamed on Russia without presenting any evidence. So come with biterness the declaration that ‘US PRIORITY IN SYRIA IS STOP ALEPPO FROM FALLING TO PRO-ASSAD FORCES’! The game is over, the king is naked : USA do not “fight terrorism” in Syria …
# LUCMICHEL. NET/ POURQUOI LES MEDIAS DE L’OTAN DENONCENT-ILS UNE FRAPPE SOI-DISANT RUSSE SUR UN CONVOI HUMANITAIRE EN SYRIE ?
Pourquoi les médias de l’OTAN dénoncent-ils une frappe soi-disant « russe » sur un convoi humanitaire en syrie ?
Tout se déroule en deux temps.
Premier mouvement :
l’US Air Force, malgré la trêve en Syrie, commet une « bavure » (selon les médias de l’OTAN) et frappe l’Armée Arabe Syrienne. En fait de « bavure », trois frappes successives. Qui appuient au sol les djihadistes de Daesh et leur permettent de s’emparer d’un aérodrome stratégique. Pris la main dans le sac, Washington est face à une crise majeure, dénoncée par Moscou et Damas. Le Temps (Genève) titre « La «bavure» qui risque de coûter cher aux Américains » (notez les guillemets du quotidien suisse à bavure) et commente : « L’aviation américaine a bombardé samedi des positions de l’armée syrienne, qui a déclaré lundi la fin de la trêve. Entre excuses et versions contradictoires, Washington y perd en crédibilité ». Le roui est nu et Washington dévoile sa complicité avec les djihadistes …
Second mouvement :
Il faut faire immédiatement oublier les frappes américaines. C’est capital pour l’opinion publique occidentale. Intervient alors la soi-disant « frappe russe sur un convoi humanitaire, que rien ne vient démontrer. La presse occidentale retourne sa veste. Le Temps titre alors « Convoi humanitaire détruit: le choc et l’effroi » (élément de langage cynique fourni par les psyops de l’OTAN, « Choc et effroi » est en fait une doctrine militaire de l’US Army visant à terroriser les pays attaqués, voir l’Irak en 2003). Et le commentaire du quotidien suisse peut redevenir anti-russe : « Les humanitaires évoquent un «crime de guerre» et une attaque contre l’humanité. Mais les politiques temporisent ». Ils temporisent car tout le monde est conscient de la grossière manipulation de Washington …
Et là vous avez tout compris ?